IRON NUTRIENT AND PLANT DEFENSE RESPONSE AGAINST PLANT PATHOGENS

Iron is an essential nutrient for most of the life forms present in earth crust.  Iron may cause physiological disorders in plants, contribute to microbial aggressiveness and exert beneficial effect on plant growth and defense (Ward 2025). Macronutrients nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium significantly influence plant defense mechanisms and are essential for synthesis of defense compounds, immune signaling and physiological responses like stomatal regulation (Dutta et al., 2024).  Whereas the micronutrients like zinc, copper and iron are essential for balancing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other reactive compound involved in the plant immune response (Marreiro et al., 2017; Dutta et al., 2024). Insufficient iron uptake causes retarded growth, interveinal chlorosis and reduced fitness (Shmidt et al., 2020). Plant and associated microbes often compete for the acquisition of iron from soil. Iron can exist in both ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) forms, allowing them to function as a catalytic component of enzymes that mediate redox reaction in many cellular processes such as photosynthesis, respiration and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication (Verbon et al., 2017; Pandey 2023). Host plant may use iron to increase local oxidative stress in defense response against the pathogen (Aznar et al., 2015).

Plant defense against pathogen and plant response to iron deficiency share many features such as secretion of phenolic compounds and use of common hormone signaling pathways (Aznar et al., 2015). The problems caused due to iron deficiency; plants use two strategies for iron absorption from the rhizosphere. First strategy is based on rhizosphere acidification and iron reduction, while second strategy is based on iron chelation (Montejano-Ramirez and Valencia-Cantero 2023). Pathogenic defense and iron uptake is not an isolated phenomenon: the antimicrobial phenols are produced by the plant during plant defense, chelation and solubilization of iron, hence the production and secretion of these molecules increase in response to iron deficiency (Montejano-Ramirez and Valencia-Cantero 2023). Iron deficiency also induces the expression of defense-related genes (Montejano-Ramirez and Valencia-Cantero 2023).

Excess iron can produce highly active ROS which are toxic to the cells of plant and pathogens (Liu et al., 2021). Iron acts as a catalyst with hydrogen peroxide through the Fenton reaction, producing ROS, including highly reactive hydroxide ion (Herlihy et al., 2020). Fenton reaction is the reaction between iron and hydrogen peroxide, generating hydroxyl radical, which is highly reactive and highly toxic to the living cells (Abe et al., 2022). The formation of hydroxyl radicals oxidizes lipids, proteins and DNA, that threatens the survival of cells (Pierre and Fontecave 1999). Therefore, plant and microbes must modulate their iron homeostasis to remain fit.

Siderophore-mediated iron uptake pathway is a common strategy used by bacteria and fungi (Liu et al., 2021). Plant use iron-withholding strategies to reduce pathogen virulence or to locally increase iron level to activate a toxic oxidative burst (Verbon et al., 2017). Few plant pathogen counteract such defenses by secreting iron-scavenging siderophores that promote iron uptake and alleviate iron-regulated host immune response (Verbon et al., 2017). Nobori et al.(2018) found that bacterial iron acquisition pathway is commonly suppressed by multiple plant immune-signaling pathway. Siderophores are biosynthetically produced and secreted by several bacteria, yeast, fungi and plants, to scavenge for Fe3+ ion (Chu et al., 2010).  Siderophores are classified into three main families depending on the characteristic functional group i.e. hydroxamates catecholates and carboxylates (Ahmed and Holmstrom 2014).  Iron is also required by pathogen for survival.  The invaded plant is the only source of iron for the pathogen. To successfully infect host plant and grow, pathogen employ multiple iron uptake systems (Liu et al., 2021). Iron has a role in pathogen virulence and most plants have evolved iron-withholding strategies to reduce iron availability to the pathogen (Ye et al., 2014). Fungal infection progressed rapidly via biotrophic to necrotrophic growth in iron-deficient leaves, while an adequate iron nutritional status of maize suppressed the formation of infection structures of the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola during the early biotrophic growth phase (Ye et al., 2014).

In wheat-Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici and rice-Magnaporthe oryzae pathosystems, ferric iron is accumulated at the site of the pathogen attack (Liu et al., 2021). The accumulated iron suppresses the growth of pathogen through a ROS burst produced by Fenton reaction (Verbon et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2021). To scavenge host iron for survival, fungal pathogens have evolved at least two iron acquisition systems. 1) System depends on secretion and subsequent uptake of Fe3+ iron-specific siderophores and 2) the other system uses cell wall iron reductases to free bound or insoluble Fe3+ iron by reducing it to Fe2+ iron for uptake (Greenshields et al., 2007). Bacteria produce all three families of siderophore. Most bacteria produce siderophore catecholates (i.e. enterobactin), few produce carboxylates (i.e. rhizobactin) and hydroxamates (i.e. ferrioxamine B) (Ahmed and Holmstrom 2014). Certain type of bacterial siderophore contain a mix of main functional group (i.e. pyoverdines) (Cornelis 2010; Ahmed and Holmstrom 2014). The most common fungal siderophores is hydroxamates (Ahmed and Holmstrom 2014; Liu et al., 2021).

Dickeya dadantii a plant pathogenic enterobacterium causes soft rot disease in a wide range of hosts including Arabidopsis thaliana (Aznar et al., 2015). During symptom progression, two distinct zone are visible: a macerated zone displaying weak iron content and a healthy zone displaying strong iron content. Immunolabelling of cell wall methylated pectin shows that pectin degradation is correlated with iron release from cell wall, indicating a strong relationship between cell wall integrity and iron in plant tissues (Aznar et al., 2015).

Fungi can take up iron when present in any wide variety of forms, which includes free iron ion, low affinity iron chelates, siderophore-iron chelates, transferrin, heme and hemoglobin (Philpott 2006). All known plant fungal pathogens that require siderophore production for virulence are necrotrophs. (Greenshields et al., 2007). Plant nutritional iron status can control infection by acting on pathogen virulence and plant defense.

References:

Abe, C., Miyazawa, T. and Miyazawa, T. 2022 Current Use of Fenton Reaction in Drugs and Food. Molecules 27(17): 5451

doi: 10.3390/molecules27175451

Ahmed, E. and Holmstrom, S. J. M. 2014 Siderophores in Environmental Research: Roles and Applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 7(3): 196 – 208

doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12117

Aznar, A., Chen, N. W. G., Thomine, S. and Dellagi, A. 2015 Immunity to Plant Pathogens and Iron Homeostasis. Plant Science 240: 90 – 97

doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.022

Chu, B. C., Garcia-Herrero, A., Johanson, T. H., Krewulak, K. D., Lau, C. K., Peacock, R. S., Slavinskaya, Z. and Vogel, H.  J. 2010 Siderophore Uptake in Bacteria and the Battle for Iron with Host; A Bird’s Eye View. Biometals 23(4): 601 – 611

doi: 10.1007/s10534-010-9361-x

Cornelis, P. 2010 Iron Uptake and Metabolism in Pseudomonads. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86(6): 1637 – 1645

doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2550-2

Dutta, A., Dracatos, P. M. and Khan, G. A. 2024 Balancing Act: The Dynamic Relationship between Nutrient Availability and Plant Defence. Plant J. 120: 1724 – 1734

doi: 10.1111/tpj.17098

Greenshields, D. L., Liu, G. and Wei, Y.  2007 Roles of Iron in Plant Defence and Fungal Virulence. Plant Signal. Behav. 2(4): 300 – 302

doi: 10.4161/psb.2.4.4042

Herlihy, J.  H., Long, T. A. and McDowell, J. M. 2020 Iron Homeostasis and Plant Immune Responses: Recent Insights and Translational Implications. J. Biol. Chem. 295(39): 13444 – 13457

doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.010856

Liu, Y., Kong, D., Wu, H-L.  and Ling, H-Q. 2021 Iron in Plant-Pathogen Interactions. J. Exp.  Bot. 72(6): 2114 – 2124

doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa516

Marreiro, D. do N., Cruz, K. J. C., Morais, J. B. S., Beserra, J. B., Severo, J. S. and de Oliveira, A. R. S. 2017 Zinc and Oxidative Stress: Current Mechanisms. Antioxidants (Basel) 6(2): 24

doi: 10.3390/antiox6020024

Montejano-Ramirez, V. and Valencia-Cantero, E. 2023 Cross-talk Between Iron Deficiency Response and Defense Establishment in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(7): 6236

doi: 10.3390/ijms24076236

Nobori, T., Velasquez, A., Wu, J., Kvitko, B. H., Kremer, J. M., Wang, Y., He, S. Y. and Tsuda, K. 2018 Transcriptome Landscape of a Bacterial Pathogen Under Plant Immunity. PNAS USA 115(13): E3055 – E3064

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800529115

Pandey, S. S. 2023 The Role of Iron in Phytopathogenic Microbe-Plant Interactions: Insights into Virulence and Host Immune Response. Sujkowska-Rybkowska M and Borucki W. (eds.) Plant (Basel) 12(17): 3173

doi: 10.3390/plants12173173

Pierre, J. L. and Fontecave, M. 1999 Iron and Activated Oxygen Species in Biology: The Basic Chemistry. Biometals 12(3): 195 – 199

doi: 10.1023/a:1009252919854

Philpott, C.  C. 2006 Iron Uptake in Fungi: A System for Every Source. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1763(7): 636 – 645

doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.008

Schmidt, W., Thomine, S. and Buckhout, T. J. 2020 Editorial: Iron Nutrition and Interactions in Plants”. Front. Plant Sci. 10: 1670

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01670

Verbon, E. H., Trapet, P. L., Stringlis, I. A., Kruijs, S., Bakker, P. A. H. M. and Pieterse, C. M. J. 2017 Iron and Immunity. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55: 355 – 375

doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035537

Ward, B. 2025 Iron and Plant Disease. In: “Mineral Nutrition and Plant Disease”. Second Edition. Chapter 9:

doi.org/10.1094/9780890546796.009

Ye, F., Albarouki, E., Lingam, B., Deising, H. B. and von Wiren, N. 2014 An Adequate Fe Nutritional Status of Maize Suppresses Infection and Biotrophic Growth of Colletotrichum graminicola. Physiol. Plant. 151(3): 280 – 292

doi: 10.1111/ppl.12166

Leave a Reply