PLANT SECONDARY METABOLITES AND PLANT DEFENSE RESPONSES PART II

Plants synthesize range of secondary metabolite which are toxic or deterrent to herbivore or pathogens. The diverse range of secondary metabolite include terpenes, phenolics, sulfur-containing compounds, saponins and alkaloid. Plant recognize elicitors/effectors produced by the pathogens and activate defense responses Concurrently several secondary messenger such as calcium ion, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and plant hormone (salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene) mediated pathway  are activated resulting in hypersensitive response (HR). Plant employ resistance (R) protein to detect effectors. Nucleotide binding-leucine rich repeat (NB-LRR) protein function as intracellular receptor for detection of pathogen effector (DeYoung et al., 2012). The leucine-rich repeats receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLK) constitute largest receptor-like kinases family (Fischer et al., 2016).   The overall signal perceived by pattern recognition receptors (receptor like kinases and receptor-like proteins) are transmitted through cytosolic protein kinases [Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)] to activate an array of transcription factors which regulates several  R genes to produce resistance-related metabolites and resistance-related proteins. The phytoanticipins and phytoalexins or their conjugate products are deposited to enforce the secondary cell wall thus limiting the spread of the pathogen (Kushalappa et al., 2016).    

The biological property of phenolic compound is their antimicrobial activity. They act as protective compounds against fungi, bacteria and viruses (Friend 1979). Phenolic compounds are of two types flavonoid and non-flavonoid (Dzialo et al., 2016; Aleixandre-Tudo et al., 2017):

  • Flavonoid compounds are: Flavonols, Flavones, Flavanones, Flavon-3-ols, Isoflavones and Aanthocyanidins
  • Non-flavonoid compounds are: Phenolic acids (hydroxycinnamic acid and hydroxybenzoic acid), Lignans, Stilbenes, Tannins and Lignins 

Accumulation of phenolic compounds at the infection site is a common feature of cell wall reinforcement in plant-microbe interactions (Field et al., 2006). Daayf et al. (2012) have studied the role of phenolics in plant defense against Phytophthora infestans and soil-borne pathogen Verticillium dahlia as well as the counter mechanisms developed by these pathogens. The phenolics that are accumulated in response to several pathogen include scopoletin (coumarin), p-coumaric acid methyl ester (a hydroxycinnamic acid derivative) or rutin (a flavonoid). Matern and Kneusel (1988) propose that the first line of defense against infection is rapid synthesis of phenolics and their polymerization into cell wall. Cell wall reinforcements are accompanied by localized production of ROS which drive cell wall cross-linking, induces antimicrobial activity and triggers localized hypersensitive response (Bradley et al., 1992; Levine et al., 1994).

Coumarins:  Plant secondary metabolites coumarins display antimicrobial and antiviral activities. Coumarins secreted by plant roots mobilizes iron through reduction and chelation and aid in iron uptake from iron limited soil (Tsai and Schmidt 2017; Stringlis et al., 2019). Petroselinum crispum and Ammi majus produce coumarin phytoalexins upon treatment with fungal elicitors and concomitantly reinforce their cell walls by ferulic ester incorporation (Matern 1991). The structural core of coumarins is 2H-1-benzopyran-2-one. Based on modification of this core coumarins may be classified into complex and simple coumarins. Complex coumarins are produced by the addition of heterocyclic compound on the basic core and further classified into furanocoumarins, pyranocoumarin, phenylcoumarins, dihydrofurocoumarin and biscoumarin (Medina et al., 2015). Simple coumarins include scopolin, scopoletin, esculin, esculetin, umbelliferone, fraxetin and sideretin which has a role in the interaction of plants and biological activities. Pathogens or elicitors activate plant defense responses leading to scopoletin accumulation in the infected tissue while scopolin is more abundant in the adjacent uninfected tissue. The scopolin when released from vacuole, is subjected to the activity of the β-glucosidases converting it to scopoletin. The scopoletin exerts its antimicrobial activity and scavenges hydrogen per oxide (H2O2) in the infected tissues therewith restricting cell death.  The plants can control scopoletin levels by converting it to scopolin via the activity of glycosyltransferases (Stringlis et al., 2019).  Development and virulence of plant pathogenic fungi undergoes an oxidative burst on its own during plant infection (Egan et al., 2007). Because scopoletin is an antioxidant may scavenge ROS thereby inhibiting the growth of fungal pathogen (Beyer et al., 2019).  Stringlis et al. (2018) found that transcription factor MYB72 regulates the excretion of the coumarin scopoletin, an iron mobilizing phenolic compound that shapes the root-associated microbial community. Coumarin interplays between the iron deficiency responses and induced systemic resistance (ISR) triggered upon colonization of roots by beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere (Pieterse et al., 2014; Verbon et al., 2017; Stringlis et al., 2018). The antibacterial activity of coumarins was found to depend on the structural requirement (Kayser and Kolodziej 1999). The presence of two methoxy and one additional phenolic group reflects highly oxygenated coumarins, this structural feature provides it the antibacterial activity.  In case of scopoletin, the toxicity depends on the presence of a methoxy (O-CH3) and a hydroxy group (-OH) in the benzene ring (Stringlis et al., 2019).

Plant derived coumarin may be explored for its natural pesticidal property against plant pathogens.

                                                                         See  Part III

                                                                         Continue ……..

References:

Aleixandre-Tudo, J. L., Buica, A., Nieuwoudt, H. H., Aleixandre, J. L. and Du Toit, W. J. 2017 Spectrophotometric Analysis of Phenolic Compounds in Grapes and Wines: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65(20): 4009 – 4026

doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01724

Beyer, S. F., Beesley, A., Rohmann, P. F.W., Schultheiss, H., Conrath, U. and Langenbach, C. J. G. 2019 The Arabidopsis Non-Host Defense-Associated Coumarin Scopoletin Protects Soybean from Asian Soybean Rust. Plant J. 99(3): 397 – 413

doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14426

Bradley, D. J., Kjellbom, P. and Lamb, C. J. 1992 Elicitor-and Wound-Induced Oxidative Cross-Linking of a Proline-Rich Plant Cell Wall Protein: A Novel Rapid Defense Response. Cell 70(1): 21 – 30

doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90530-p

Daayf, F., El Hadrami, A., El-Bebany, A. F., Henriquez, M. A., Yao, Z., Derksen, H., El-Hadrami, I. and Adam, L. R. 2012 Phenolic Compounds in Plant Defense and Pathogen Counter-Defense Mechanisms. In: “Recent Advances in Polyphenol Research”.  Cheynier, V., Sarni-Manchado, P. and Quideau, S. (eds.). Volume 3, Chapter 8: 191 – 208

doi.org/10.1002/9781118299753.ch8

DeYoung, B. J., Qi, D., Kim, S-H., Burke, T. P. and Innes, R. W. 2012 Activation of a Plant Nucleotide Binding-Leucine Rich Repeat Disease Resistance Protein by a Modified Self Protein. Cell Microbiol. 14(7): 1071 – 1084

doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01779.x

Dzialo, M., Mierziak, J., Korzun, U., Preisner, M., Szopa, J. and Kulma, A. 2016 The Potential of Plant Phenolics in Prevention and Therapy of Skin Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17(2): 160

doi: 10.3390/ijms17020160

Egan, M. J., Wang, Z-Y., Jones, M. A., Smirnoff, N. and Talbot, N. J. 2007 Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species by Fungal NADPH Oxidases is required for Rice Blast Disease. PNAS USA 104(28): 11772 – 11777

doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700574104

Field, B., Jordan, F. and Osbourn, A. 2006 First Encounters-Deployment of Defense-Related Natural Products by Plants. New Phytol. 172(2): 193 – 204

doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01863.x

Fischer, I., Dievart, A., Droc, G.,   Dufayard, J-F. and Chantret, N. 2016 Evolutionary Dynamics of the Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor-Like Kinase (LRR-RLK) Subfamily in Angiosperms. Plant Physiol. 170(3): 1595 – 1610

doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01470

Friend, J. 1979 Phenolic Substances and Plant Disease. In “Biochemistry of Plant Phenolics” Swain, T., Harbone, J. B. and Van Sumere, C. F. (eds). Springer Boston, MA. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 12: 557 – 588

doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3372-2­_17

Kayser, O. and Kolodziej, H. 1999 Antibacterial Activity of Simple Coumarins: Structural Requirements for Biological Activity. Z Naturforsch C. J. Biosci. 54(3-4): 169 – 174

doi: 10.1515/znc-1999-3-405

Kushalappa, A. C., Yogendra, K. N. and Karre, S. 2016 Plant Innate Immune Response: Qualitative and Quantitative Resistance. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 35(1): 38 – 55

doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2016.1148980

Levine, A., Tenhaken, R., Dixon, R. and Lamb, C. 1994 H2O2 from the Oxidative Burst Orchestrates the Plant Hypersensitive Disease Resistance Response. Cell 79(4): 583 – 593

doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90544-4

Matern, U. 1991 Coumarins and other Phenylpropanoid Compounds in the Defense Response of Plant Cells. Planta Med. 57(7 Suppl): S15 – S20

doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960224

Matern, U. and Kneusel, R. E. 1988 Phenolics Compounds in Plant Disease Resistance. Phytoparasitica 16(2): 153 – 170

doi.org/10.1007/BF02980469

Medina, F. G., Marrero, J. G., Alonso, M. M., Gonzalez, M. C., Cordova-Guerrero, I., Garcia, A. G. T. and Osegueda-Robles, S. 2015 Coumarin Heterocyclic Derivatives: Chemical Synthesis and Biological Activity. Nat. Prod. Report 32: 1472 – 1507

doi:10.1039/c4np00162a

Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M. and Bakker, P. A. H. M. 2014 Induced Systemic Resistance by Beneficial Microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52: 347 – 375

doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340

Stringlis, I. A., de Jonge, R. and Pieterse, C. M. J. 2019 The Age of Coumarins in Plant-Microbe Interactions. Plant and Cell Physiol. 60(7): 1405 – 1419

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcz076

Stringlis, I. A., Yu, K., Feussner, K., de Jonge, R.,  Bentum, S. V., Van Verk, M. C., Berendsen, R. L., Bakker, P. A. H. M., Feussner, I. and Pieterse, C. M. J.  2018 MYB72-Dependent Coumarin Exudation Shapes Root Microbiome Assembly to Promote Plant Health. PNAS 115(22): E5213 – E5222

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722335115

Tsai, H-H. and Schmidt, W. 2017 Mobilization of Iron by Plant Borne Coumarins. Trends Plant Sci. 22(6): 1 – 11

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.03.008

Verbon, E. H., Trapet, P. L., Stringlis, I. A., Kruijs, S., Bakker, P. A. H. M. and Pieterse, C. M. J. 2017 Iron and Immunity. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55: 355 – 375

doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035537

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s